User talk:Iraag
Introduction
[edit]Hey! this is Iraag welcomes you here. Well, you can leave your message below and do try to keep it neat and clean as much as it's possible. Iraag (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Messages
[edit]The basics
[edit]Hello, I don't know if you have already, but I highly recommend you read the 5 Pillars of Wikipedia and get used to the policies and guidelines before doing any further editing. If you have questions, let me know. JMHamo (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC).
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Iraag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I agree that I've committed a mistake but I don't think that blocking was a solution rather helping me out. Even no one has considered my comments on ANI before blocking me Its like every admin went against me as well as I think someone who have argued me in this matter have more than 1 account and that must be considered.
Decline reason:
I feel there is insufficient evidence for me to support unblocking at this time. --slakr\ talk / 10:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- "a mistake"? Numerous mistakes I think you mean, and you'll need to be able to identify each one, explain why they're wrong, and advise how you'll fix it so it won't happen ever again. Of course "every admin" probably spoke against you: that's because we're aware of all the policies you're violating DP 10:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Transparency International India
[edit]Hello Iraag,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Transparency International India for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Op47 (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Transparency International India.gif
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)